Skip to main content
GameDev.net gamedev.net
🔒 Locked

filesharing morality

Started by a38750 Jan 18, 2003 at 7:28 AM 0 replies 600+ views
Original Post
a38750
a38750
Just a thought, not neccessarily an entrenched opinion of mine, merely experimenting with ideas: Perhaps governments should pass special bills to protect the sales of bottled water against "water piracy". Oviously this is ridiculous, but why? Because nobody can deny people access to water that''s around them. It would be ridiculous to try to restrict water usage to small sellable units in bottles. Similarly, have we just become accustomed to a world where music can be "trapped" in discs/tapes etc. to the point where we consider it someone''s right to sell portions of music they make. Maybe we should just accept that this is no longer possible today. Information is now like water. If someone makes some music, or a movie, or software, they should just have to accept that it cannot be sold. All these copy protection systems, including palladium, are ugly botch job "solutions" trying to maintain the status quo. Like the bottled water companies demanding the goverment make unliscenced distillation equipment illegal. At this point I''m sure the responses are "what about all the music/movie/software creators? Do they just lose their income then?". Well, I suppose, yes. But it''s no argument for keeping things the way they are. Should we continue to use coal for as long as possible just to support coal miners? How about "we won''t have any music if nobody gets paid to do it". Well, I suppose we don''t have a very nice UNIX clone because nobody paid the programmers to make it. Oh, we do? Well maybe people will carry on making music and distributing it freely. It may not be their main occupation because there would only be a bit of money to be made from gigs/fan-tshirts etc, but I bet it''d be the best of what we have today. "How about movies? they cost millions!". Would you really miss most of the hollywood shite we get today? I''d be happy with more amateur productions. People still go to the cinema because it''s an experience, like a gig. This would provide enough money for productions once the excessive costs of todays productions are removed. Maybe we''re all too addicted to the market driven culture we are fed today. I think it would be a refreshing change rather than a disaster if all of it died because of "piracy". Think how nice it would be if our culture was fed by people''s desire to create rather than for money. (press that commie-alert button ) (note: I acknowledge that the water analogy is flawed because water is still a real commodity that cannot be duplicated like data can. Unfortunatly it''s the closest analogy I could think of)
antistuff
antistuff


Myth #1 : all this filetrading will stop people from getting paid to make music
Myth #2 : if you cant make money from music, then nobody will make it

The couple of people who do make a living from the music that they make make most of thier money from playing shows. Notice i used the words couple of people, as in very few. The people who make money from CDs are the record labels.

Most people who make music dont get any money from it anyway. Ive been in a band for years and playing shows actualy costs me money because its rare that you even get enough for gas. I still have an insentive to do it, i enjoy it.

The new world is dead, welcome to the way things were for a long time. I say good, we are better off for it.

Topic Locked

This topic has been locked by a moderator. New replies are not allowed.

Sign in to reply to this topic.