Original Post
Yes, this is another Iraq thread, but I''m kinda curious about what you guys think.
Lets say the US goes ahead and invades Iraq. If whether or not they had UN approval makes a difference in your response then say so. But lets say the US invades Iraq and Saddam fires nerve gas on the US troops. What then? Was Saddam just defending himself, and justified, or did he use illegal chemical weapons he isn''t supposed to have and must be punished by more force?
That is the question. Now here''s the rules: don''t get mad and arguing and all that stuff. Try not to make anyone else mad by saying something like "LETS BOMB THE F-ERS TO HELL!" or "BUSH IS A F-EN PIECE OF S-!" you know, stuff like that.
I''m just curious about whether the above senario would or wouldn''t change anyone''s idea about what should be done.