Skip to main content
gamedev.net
🔒 Locked

BEHEMOTH!

Started by DukeAtreides076 Aug 28, 2003 at 7:36 PM 12 replies 1.2k views
Bossk
Bossk
It still can''t hold up to the awesome power of the ENIAC.
Drooling Iguana
Drooling Iguana
I wonder what kind of framerates that thing would get in Quake...
DukeAtreides076
DukeAtreides076
I wonder if that thing could crack RSA.

Edit: (In a relatively short time)

[edited by - DukeAtreides076 on August 28, 2003 9:06:18 PM]
Mirgatroid
Mirgatroid
quote:
Original post by The Reindeer Effect
I think Quake is limited by graphics card, not CPU.


quake 1 had a software renderer

i''d like to see a real-time raytracer on that
maybe us gamedevers could make an online cluster
End Of Discussion.
DukeAtreides076
DukeAtreides076
quote:
Original post by Mirgatroid
quote:
Original post by The Reindeer Effect
I think Quake is limited by graphics card, not CPU.


quake 1 had a software renderer

i''d like to see a real-time raytracer on that
maybe us gamedevers could make an online cluster


I''m up for it.
BradDaBug
BradDaBug
No one should have two processors until everyone has one.
I like the DARK layout!
DukeAtreides076
DukeAtreides076
And nobody should have 2000 until DukeAtreides076 has at least 1999.....
Witchcraven
Witchcraven
Why didnt they use opteron processors, that are about as fast but way cheaper? Maybe thats how the US spends a billion a day.
--------------------------I present for tribute this haiku:Inane Ravings OfThe Haunting JubilationA Mad Engineer©Copyright 2005 ExtrariusAll Rights Reserved
yummy_potatoes
yummy_potatoes
Anyone notice that this information came from The Register...
"I once thought I was wrong, but then I was mistaken." - A4
TreizeSG
TreizeSG
Behemoth? I''ve got a bunch of them.

Project ARPEG: Product, Darkness SeigeThe seige begins...
DakeDesu
DakeDesu
I do not know Hardware well. Has the Intenium cut out the backwards compadible poo that made the i386 chips so much fun?

Topic Locked

This topic has been locked by a moderator. New replies are not allowed.

Sign in to reply to this topic.