Original Post
Been working the last night with a language processor where the application recieves a text-file as input and creates a map based on the approximity of different words, from which it produces a random sentence. There''s been some interesting results..
Some (random, not activly selected) examples with an essay on nordic mythology as input:
He keeps his feet when she makes her choice.
The myths in the triad of the older poem Haustlong where the shape with him to the shape with other traditions usually only have one.
She also demands that Lodur and is Loki, the same.
I will show that chapter of Loki and cannot draw any substantial conclusion about the desires of her own volition, but where the most apparent of the the the fact that Loki in his own volition, but the the the two other myths where the shape of Loki is the the desires of the other traditions usually only be able see his feet when she will only have one.
Loki and Lodur and that the first human beings.
In this claim is questionable the same.
Further it is Loki, the two latter gods by the fact that Loki is Loki, the creation of two other traditions usually only confuse the fact that are one and Loki.
Some of those acutally makes sense. I imagine with a better set of carefully selected inputs, you can shape the results into a more narrow set of outputs, producing a fairly predetermined result with a good deal of variation.
Improvements to this would be to, for example, replace all nouns in the input with a tag which would be replaced by a appropriate noun for the current context fetched from a database..
So, what do you think?
-Luctus
Statisticly seen, most things happens to other people. [Mail]
Statisticly seen, most things happens to other people. [Mail]