🔒 Locked
Random Database Idea Needed
Advertisement
Original Post
Hey, can anyone think of good idea for a simple database around 6 tables or so.
Are you meaning 6 related files? Tables are a spreadsheet term, not a database term.
A common database app is a cutomer database/sales system (point of sale).
You can have:
Inventory File
Customer File
Sales File
Suppliers File
and usually a 'company file' that stores all your setup information (options for the software if you make your software more universal).
Relations would be:
Customer<->Sales (via the customer ID number)
Sales<->Inventory (via the Inventory item number)
Inventory<->Suppliers (Via the Inventory Item number)
hope this helps.. i've done a ton of database programming in the past.
A common database app is a cutomer database/sales system (point of sale).
You can have:
Inventory File
Customer File
Sales File
Suppliers File
and usually a 'company file' that stores all your setup information (options for the software if you make your software more universal).
Relations would be:
Customer<->Sales (via the customer ID number)
Sales<->Inventory (via the Inventory item number)
Inventory<->Suppliers (Via the Inventory Item number)
hope this helps.. i've done a ton of database programming in the past.
Most example databases (in mssql for example) are customer/order systems, tables containing information about:
Nothing exciting, but it's a way to fill around six related tables.
[edit]
Oops, posts have a tendency to get redundant if you don't push that sumbit button fast enough ;)
[/edit]
- the products (name, description, price etc.)
- the customers (name, address, etc.)
- the orders (amount, product id, customer id etc.)
- etc...
Nothing exciting, but it's a way to fill around six related tables.
[edit]
Oops, posts have a tendency to get redundant if you don't push that sumbit button fast enough ;)
[/edit]
Quote:
Original post by superpig Quote:...
Original post by aegrimonia
Tables are a spreadsheet term, not a database term.
In fact, a "table" is really called an "entity". Not a "file".
Terminology varies, so let's stick to what the most popular packages call them, "tables".
EDIT: for the record (pun intended), we were informed that we would lose marks calling them tables in AS ICT.
Quote:
Original post by benryves Quote:
Original post by superpig Quote:...
Original post by aegrimonia
Tables are a spreadsheet term, not a database term.
In fact, a "table" is really called an "entity". Not a "file".
Terminology varies, so let's stick to what the most popular packages call them, "tables".
EDIT: for the record (pun intended), we were informed that we would lose marks calling them tables in AS ICT.
I'm very confused by this line of questioning. If databases don't have tables, then MS Access, SQL Server, Oracle, and every other database I've ever used has been doing it wrong. For that matter, half of the ANSI SQL needs to be redone, at least regarding these fictitious tables. I can accept the term entity.
I just made one with 14 tables.
Damn that go-cart college assignment.
Damn that go-cart college assignment.
Quote:
Original post by TheSorcerer
I just made one with 14 tables.
Damn that go-cart college assignment.
Yeah damn college assignments, they suck!
Had a kind of brain drain in terms of ideas. It's Oracle, so we needed something a little heavier than a CD database. Like the league idea,
Quote:
Original post by benryves
for the record (pun intended), we were informed that we would lose marks calling them tables in AS ICT.
So in 4th year at college I and all my lecturers are using the wrong terminology.
A'int records technically supposed to be called tuples too. :)
Topic Locked
This topic has been locked by a moderator. New replies are not allowed.
Sign in to reply to this topic.
Advertisement