The worldmap

i personaly like one big map
but thats just me.



-------------------------------------------------
Don't take life too seriously, you''ll never get out of it alive. -Bugs Bunny

Well, What type of game is it?
Different parts will probably discourage the player



- Goblineye Entertainment
The road to success is always under construction

One big map is cool and easy, but not if it doesn''t fit into memory. For example Ultima 9 was just one huge map, but if you started running in a direction it slowed to a crawl, because the harddrive was shoveling in data into memory (I have 128 MB, that oughta be enough for quite a bit of data).

That''s where I would have said "OK, so load a few seconds during the game and give me a responsive game instead!" *That* can really discourage a gamer.

Or, take a look at Half-Life ... lot''s of small maps, but it only needed to load 5-10 seconds ... that wasn''t bad at all I didn''t get discouraged by that.

Another example, StarTrek Voyager: Elite Force. It had smallish maps *and* long loading times. This game almost drove me insane ... Wait 1 minute for a level to load, which you''ll only spend 10 minutes (or less!!!) in. Or, when you load a savegame from that level, it doesn''t try to reuse the level data ... I mean, even Deus Ex manages to load a 25 MB savegame faster than StarTrek... That is bad.

I guess, my point is ... one huge map is cool, if you can pull it off with a reasonable usage of resources. If you can''t, then better stick to smaller maps and try keeping the load-times low.

MK42