Original Post
🔒 Locked
Programming languages
Advertisement
Thumbing through the .Net Forum should answer most of your questions.
C# and VB 7 (VB .Net) are part of the .Net platform. So saying C#.Net is redundant as there is no other C#.
.Net, in a sentence, is a platform with a single underlying byte-code that all languages are translated to, thus making it platform independent and very easy to have multiple languages working in conjunction with each other.
One of the co-ops I was offered was a very large company in the Northeast (who, as a matter of fact, have the largest scale .Net application on the east coast). While obviously game companies aren't rushing to .Net, many other companies are, and for good reason.
C# and VB 7 (VB .Net) are part of the .Net platform. So saying C#.Net is redundant as there is no other C#.
.Net, in a sentence, is a platform with a single underlying byte-code that all languages are translated to, thus making it platform independent and very easy to have multiple languages working in conjunction with each other.
One of the co-ops I was offered was a very large company in the Northeast (who, as a matter of fact, have the largest scale .Net application on the east coast). While obviously game companies aren't rushing to .Net, many other companies are, and for good reason.
Quote:Humorously, my experience with C# is primarily with Mono, and you're right. For some reason I think of the runtime as .Net. The marketing is obviously working.
Original post by Sneftel Quote:
Original post by Brandon N
So saying C#.Net is redundant as there is no other C#.
Au contraire. Saying that C# == C#.net is as accurate as saying that C++ == VC++.net.
Topic Locked
This topic has been locked by a moderator. New replies are not allowed.
Sign in to reply to this topic.
Advertisement