🔒 Locked
Linux file system
Advertisement
Original Post
Alright, i'm taking the plunge, and i'm installing Mandrivia Linux LE 2005 on a seperate HDD. Now, I created a 75gig partion with Acronis Disk Director for it. Now, what file system do I want? NTFS? EXT3? EXT2? Anyhelp ASAP would be awesome! Cheers! //edit: Oh, I tried to let the installer for linux format the partion, but it didn't know how to handle a partion with no file system :P
Quote:
Original post by _Sigma
Alright, i'm taking the plunge, and i'm installing Mandrivia Linux LE 2005 on a seperate HDD. Now, I created a 75gig partion with Acronis Disk Director for it. Now, what file system do I want? NTFS? EXT3? EXT2? Anyhelp ASAP would be awesome!
Cheers!
//edit:
Oh, I tried to let the installer for linux format the partion, but it didn't know how to handle a partion with no file system :P
Why don't you partition straight from the installer ? That being said, EXT3 and ReiserFS are your best bets.
ReiserFS is faster when accessing lots of small files. However, it is less stable. You'll never have a problem with an ext3 filesystem, but I have heard of people having problems with a reiserfs filesystem...
It all depends what you want. I personally run ext3, for no particular reason.
It all depends what you want. I personally run ext3, for no particular reason.
Quote:I thought XFS was a proprietary IRIX filesystem. Then maybe I can finally manage to get some files off of my old SGI machine.
Original post by Richy2k
ReiserFS if you are gonna end up having lots of small files (most likely). XFS if you are gonna have lots of large files (unlikely). ext3 if you are unsure.
I'd be kind of fun (and embarassing) to see some of those old OpenGL projects again..
Quote:
Original post by python_regious
ReiserFS is faster when accessing lots of small files. However, it is less stable. You'll never have a problem with an ext3 filesystem, but I have heard of people having problems with a reiserfs filesystem...
It all depends what you want. I personally run ext3, for no particular reason.
I don't know. ReiserFS 3 is pretty solid, from my experience. It's what I use. ReiserFS 4 is possibly less so, as it's not in the mainline kernel and hasn't been tested as much.
Ext3 is as good a place as any to start, though.
I've had a rough time with ReiserFS...I personally suggest ext3. The only reason I suggest that over ext2 is because 3 is journaled.
Quote:
Original post by Doc
ReiserFS 4 is possibly less so, as it's not in the mainline kernel and hasn't been tested as much.
The ReiserFS page has this to say:
Quote:
We must caution that just as Linux 2.6 is not yet as stable as Linux 2.4, it will also be some substantial time before V4 is as stable as V3.
Also from that page, it's interesting to find out that Reiser4's primary sponsor is DARPA.
Topic Locked
This topic has been locked by a moderator. New replies are not allowed.
Sign in to reply to this topic.
Advertisement