Quote:
Original post by Eelco
Changes that are blatantly intent on transferring wealth have a tendency to evoke such responses, yeah.
Insurance is a "wealth transfer" (when you make a claim). I guess we shouldn't have insurance, then?
"Wealth transfer" is one of the dumbest reactionary terms I've ever encountered. You like having roads, police, emergency services? Wealth transfer. The benefit you gain from them, individually, far outstrips your contribution to their creation and upkeep. How do you feel about unemployment benefits? If you've never been unemployed you've never needed them, but if you have you're probably very grateful.
Wealth transfer. Your individual contribution is not as large as your maximum benefit payout.
Our entire infrastructure of social and collective services is
based on "wealth transfer," so to cite that as an excuse (and then to qualify it with the adjective "blatant" is just hilarious) for refusing to evaluate proposals to furnish a necessary public good that is bankrupting the economy is, quite simply, stupid.