Skip to main content
GameDev.net gamedev.net
🔒 Locked

Reserved and gentlemanly UK elections thread (tea and crumpets inside)

Started by OrangyTang May 6, 2010 at 7:32 AM 90 replies 12.2k views
Original Post
OrangyTang
OrangyTang
Today in the uk we've got two (or even three in some places) elections going on - the general election, council elections and mayoral elections. The bbc have a nice overview of the current goings on. Polls have consistantly the result as too close to call at the moment, with the current estimates being either a slim Tory majority or a hung parliment where no one party has a majority, which could potentially get very interesting (or messy, depending on how things go). I'd be particularly interested in what coverage non-UK people have seen - I was very surprised when one of the debates was the front story on The Daily Show a week or so ago, but I suspect that other than some token coverage most US news outlets will have barely touched it. So now all the political campaigning, arguing and showboating has finished, we can finally sit back with tea and crumpets and watch the numbers and analysis slowly unfolds over the next 24 hours or so. What say you, chaps?
Sirisian
Sirisian
Quote:
Original post by OrangyTang
What say you, chaps?

Tea and crumpets look gross.

On a related note, you're right. The US media doesn't cover UK politics much at all. It sound absolutely riveting though. A real nail biter.
ukdeveloper
ukdeveloper
I'm hoping to see a slim Conservative majority, myself. Better than a hung Parliament and people voting for Lib Dem simply because of "Cleggmania" and people who still have irrational hangups about Thatcher; perfect recipe to weasel Gordon Brown back in for five more years of bankruptcy, Big Brother, zero civil liberties, expenses fiddling etc. usw.

People spread this muck about the Tories but most of it is related to the early Thatcher years when the country was totally broke after yet another Labour recession. 30 years ago, for fuck's sake - things weren't even half as bad as they are now.

It's so shallow and narrow minded. The Tories have moved on, give them a chance.

Apparently one of the C-SPAN channels in the US is having dedicated coverage of the election later on tonight.
ExcessNeo
ExcessNeo
Skip the tea but yes to the crumpets.

Personally I would like the Liberal Democrats to get into power, mainly because no the Tories have not changed, they may have a flashy expensive advertising campaign to sell this but where did they get this money? From big corporations who know that if the Tories get into power they will be given tax breaks, etc.

While Labour hasn't been fantastic as someone said on First Time Voters question time, Gordon Brown was elected captain of a sinking ship, there are some major things Labour has done successfully since the last time the conservatives were in power such as the minimum wage, reducing the wait time of patients. While no I don't support labour personally I have nothing but contempt for the "For the Rich" attitude the conservatives seem to have.

The downside to the election is due to the way it works chances are even if Liberal Democrats were to have the majority Labour would still somehow be in power I believe.

Which is absolutely ludicrous.
Katie
Katie
"Tea and crumpets look gross."


You have to imagine that the crumpets are sort of cakey, served hot and the point of the holes is that the butter soaks into the cakeiness.

oliii
oliii
This election is pretty uninspiring. Looks more like a triplet of whining clones rather than a clash of ideas and ideals. All of them peddle 'change' (how original), but really, it will be pretty much 'steady as she goes' whoever you choose, recession and all. Same old same old... Lukewarm politics, soft as jelly those three. The tabloid press is a fun read though. Rupert Murdoch's drone army in full alert!

Would be funny seeing the Lib Dems getting to n.10, and starting to wonder about how to actually run a country.
Everything is better with Metal.
OrangyTang
OrangyTang
Quote:
Original post by Sirisian
Tea and crumpets look gross.

You sir, have no taste, and I thumb my nose at you.

Meanwhile we've got pre-analysis analysis in the form of this poll of polls. Which generally suggests that polls are fairly accurate but by no means able to conclusively state the outcome ahead of time. So not particularly surprising there then. :)
ukdeveloper
ukdeveloper
Quote:
Original post by OrangyTang
Quote:
Original post by Sirisian
Tea and crumpets look gross.

You sir, have no taste, and I thumb my nose at you.

Meanwhile we've got pre-analysis analysis in the form of this poll of polls. Which generally suggests that polls are fairly accurate but by no means able to conclusively state the outcome ahead of time. So not particularly surprising there then. :)


I tend to look at the polls, but taking them as gospel is the wrong thing to do.

There were something like 35% undecided before today and most of them will likely have voted by now, or perhaps will do so on the way home from work etc. It's anyone's guess what these people eventually decided, or if they even decided at all - some people literally turn up at the polling station, get their ballot paper and spent 30s in the booth swithering before putting their X down as opposed to researching in advance.

That said, the Tories have been ahead in the polls for quite some time now, with a ten point lead at one stage (which they seem to have pissed away, regrettably).

Cameron's the man for No. 10, if you ask me. Brown has had it; he's lost the plot, has no regard for the electorate and has tarnished the Labour Party's reputation forever. I would actually have considered voting Labour if he had quit and a new and totally different leader attempted to take the party in a new direction, despite all their previous problems. A new leader and a genuine pledge to backpedal and improve might just have reeled me in.

Lib Dems have an overinflated view of how they're doing, and people are voting for them to keep the Tories out (stupid, stupid, stupid - this leads to a hung Parliament and more Labour while the bond markets crash because the speculators have shat themselves, and all this talk of "tactical voting" is highly irresponsible if you ask me) and then you have the joke novelty parties like BNP who may even be on the brink of collapse because this new scandal of scuffling with the Asian kids, and all these issues with their webmaster, have sent the party shuddering to its very core by the sounds of it.
_the_phantom_
_the_phantom_
Quote:
Original post by ukdeveloper
The Tories have moved on, give them a chance.


I'll believe it when I see it; I remember the feeling for the 80s and early 90s, and for 'the average working man' having them in power is not, and will not, be a good thing.

As a leader Cameron is another Blair; lots of flash but I'm not seeing any substance.

The Independent had an intresting article about a council area which Cameron has held up as a model for how they should do things.

That model has included closing down homeless shelters, closing down youth centres (including one gifted to the area to trying and sell it) and leveling charges at the old and the sick.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Labour are prefect but if anyone thinks the Conservatives will sweap into power and make life better for the working man.. well, they are sorely mistaken.

Personally, I don't think ANY of the parties deserve my support, and as there is no way to express this which counts I won't be voting. I believe the whole system needs to be scrapped and we need to rethink everything based on the age we live in now and the realities of it.
Ravuya
Ravuya
If I may, I like how the Lib Dems have demonstrated the serious problems with a "first past the post" electoral system. Canada has a similar problem - our minority government was originally elected on something like 33% of the vote and remains several years later despite its general (non-Ipsos) approval rating never really breaking that.

The combination of district gerrymandering and the lack of proportional representation is starting to really wear me out on traditional electoral systems. Of course the guys who are winning as a result are not going to be campaigning on fixing it.
Katie
Katie
Look. I'm on a diet here. Will people PLEASE for the love of anything you hold holy, PLEASE STOP POSTING PICTURES OF FOOD!!!
ukdeveloper
ukdeveloper
Quote:
Original post by phantom
I'll believe it when I see it; I remember the feeling for the 80s and early 90s, and for 'the average working man' having them in power is not, and will not, be a good thing.


Yes, the Poll Tax was a disaster and Mrs. Thatcher lost her influence and got booted out in favour of John Major. Let's not forget that the early 1980s recession was due to the horrible state Labour left the country in - the UK was within 45 minutes of total bankruptcy in 1976 until the IMF saved us, then there was the Winter of Discontent and a recession. It was a desperate situation which required desperate measures, and Thatcher brought those.

Quote:
As a leader Cameron is another Blair;


Yes, people have said that. However, can they prove it? Cameron hasn't been in office yet so who knows how he'll do things?

Quote:
lots of flash but I'm not seeing any substance.


Don't tell the Labourites that; they think Blair was wonderful (which he was in comparison to Crash Gordon)

Quote:

The Independent had an intresting article about a council area which Cameron has held up as a model for how they should do things... That model has included closing down homeless shelters, closing down youth centres (including one gifted to the area to trying and sell it) and leveling charges at the old and the sick.


This is not representative of the UK as a whole; this is one Conservative council which I agree appears to have done things the wrong way entirely and I disapprove. I wouldn't tar all of the councils with the same brush; Edinburgh Pentland (my old constituency before it got merged in 2004) was Tory run and everything was great, but there will always be anomalies in the system.

Quote:

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Labour are prefect but if anyone thinks the Conservatives will sweap into power and make life better for the working man.. well, they are sorely mistaken.


Thatcher crushed the Unions and, I think, quite rightly. They were throwing a hissy fit and brought the country to its knees without any form of justification or remorse - Unions are there to support the workers, not to flick switches and crash the economy into a wall.

Quote:

Personally, I don't think ANY of the parties deserve my support, and as there is no way to express this which counts I won't be voting. I believe the whole system needs to be scrapped and we need to rethink everything based on the age we live in now and the realities of it.


Yeah, I'm not exactly enamoured with the whole business of the party coming second or last getting to keep power in the event of a hung Parliament. In my view, the party with the most seats should form a Government, end of story. The House of Commons/Lords are relics that don't fit the 21st century, or even the 20th either.

_the_phantom_
_the_phantom_
Quote:
Original post by ukdeveloper
Quote:

The Independent had an intresting article about a council area which Cameron has held up as a model for how they should do things... That model has included closing down homeless shelters, closing down youth centres (including one gifted to the area to trying and sell it) and leveling charges at the old and the sick.


This is not representative of the UK as a whole; this is one Conservative council which I agree appears to have done things the wrong way entirely and I disapprove. I wouldn't tar all of the councils with the same brush; Edinburgh Pentland (my old constituency before it got merged in 2004) was Tory run and everything was great, but there will always be anomalies in the system.


And I'd say that as well, if Cameron hadn't praised this area as the way forward for his party..

Quote:

Thatcher crushed the Unions and, I think, quite rightly. They were throwing a hissy fit and brought the country to its knees without any form of justification or remorse - Unions are there to support the workers, not to flick switches and crash the economy into a wall.


Agreed, but I'm not talking about the unions, I'm talking about every day life for people in general.

In my example, for most of my life despite both my parents working what 'luxuries' we had were generally second hand or rented (in the case of TVs or video recorders) and food was very tight at times. This defintely picked up in the Labour years.

ChurchSkiz
ChurchSkiz
I never knew a crumpet was an english muffin. If you're in england, shouldn't you just be calling them muffins?
ukdeveloper
ukdeveloper
Quote:
Original post by ChurchSkiz
I never knew a crumpet was an english muffin. If you're in england, shouldn't you just be calling them muffins?


Nope, in the UK a "muffin" is one of these:



"English muffin" isn't a term used here, they're "crumpets".
Silvermyst
Silvermyst
Been following the campaign a bit on Andrew Sullivan's blog. Really enjoyed bigot-gate.
You either believe that within your society more individuals are good than evil, and that by protecting the freedom of individuals within that society you will end up with a society that is as fair as possible, or you believe that within your society more individuals are evil than good, and that by limiting the freedom of individuals within that society you will end up with a society that is as fair as possible.
Nypyren
Nypyren
I have no bib and I must drool!
LessBread
LessBread
Quote:
Original post by Katie
"Tea and crumpets look gross."

You have to imagine that the crumpets are sort of cakey, served hot and the point of the holes is that the butter soaks into the cakeiness.


I don't think those crumpets looked gross, just that yellow stuff sitting on top of them. Is that supposed to be butter?

Quote:
Original post by ukdeveloper
Apparently one of the C-SPAN channels in the US is having dedicated coverage of the election later on tonight.


C-SPAN covers Prime Minister's Questions, so that wouldn't surprise me. What would surprise me is if they covered it on their two primary channels given that Congress is in session and those channels are dedicated to covering Congress when it is in session. They might show it on C-SPAN 3, but that channel isn't part of the basic cable package. At any rate, since the UK is 8 hours ahead of the US - five ahead of the East Coast - my guess is that the polls there are closing right about now (unless they stay open later than 8 pm) and the returns should come in within an hour or so. CNN might cover the elections, since their primary news shows run in the afternoon here.

As for US coverage of the UK elections. The style of the debate got some attention but not the substance of the debate. The performance of Nick Clegg at the debate also got some attention. Gordon Brown got some coverage for slagging that old woman when he thought his mic was off.

It seems to me that the UK wants Labour policies but not Brown. In which case a hung parliament would be the best outcome. Brown would have to step down for losing. If no government can be formed and new elections are called, then maybe Labour, with new leadership, can make a comeback. If Labour suffers a clear defeat then maybe the UK does not want Labour policies. Even if the defeat isn't clear, I would expect to hear a lot of spin asserting that the UK public doesn't want Labour policies. It's too easy to spin dislike for a person (Brown) as dislike for policy.

On an unrelated note, props to Tottenham for taking down Man City yesterday. Good luck in next years Champions League competition!

"I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes." - the Laughing Man
OrangyTang
OrangyTang
Quote:
Original post by LessBread
It seems to me that the UK wants Labour policies but not Brown.

The thing is that there's a serious disconnect between the stated Labour policies and their actual behaviour. Theoretically they're mostly socialist, in favour of well funded education, national health service, welfare and policing, and aren't afraid to have (relatively) high taxes to fund those. IMHO these are all things that resonate well with the general public.

However their track record has been pretty bad - in particular their constant passing of knee-jerk legislation and walking all over civil liberties, combined with a long and unpopular war means that even if people agree with their basic philosophy they're going to vote for "the other guy" regardless.

Sadly when I went shopping yesterday they were actually all out of crumpets (!) so instead I've had to settle for (bread) muffins.

Topic Locked

This topic has been locked by a moderator. New replies are not allowed.

Sign in to reply to this topic.