Original Post
I know we have quite a few grammar nazis here. I've never really gotten irked about people who misuse your you're, there there, alot a lot, etc.
I read this today and laughed my ass off:
The alot monster.
But then I got to thinking, you have allot, which no one should ever use (unless you are trying to sound like an assbag by not using "distribute"). And you have a lot, which is by definition, one LOT. Unless we are referring to land or cardboard shipping boxes, I have never actually heard anyone describe anything by its lot size, or as one lot in general.
For instance, what would you think if someone told you, "I have one lot of pencils?" Or, "I get angry one lot."
There should be a new word, to describe a large amount or frequency of something: alot.
a lot: I have a lot of land (one lot). The lot size of those pencils is 30, and I have a lot of them (30).
alot: I get mad alot (frequently). I have alot of pens (a large amount).
The time is here for alot to achieve its freedom.
I read this today and laughed my ass off:
The alot monster.
But then I got to thinking, you have allot, which no one should ever use (unless you are trying to sound like an assbag by not using "distribute"). And you have a lot, which is by definition, one LOT. Unless we are referring to land or cardboard shipping boxes, I have never actually heard anyone describe anything by its lot size, or as one lot in general.
For instance, what would you think if someone told you, "I have one lot of pencils?" Or, "I get angry one lot."
There should be a new word, to describe a large amount or frequency of something: alot.
a lot: I have a lot of land (one lot). The lot size of those pencils is 30, and I have a lot of them (30).
alot: I get mad alot (frequently). I have alot of pens (a large amount).
The time is here for alot to achieve its freedom.