- Why is christanity the most popular religion in US and possibly the world?
- Why does it seem like the majority of christianity are black?
I'm not really sure as I haven't been around much nor had the patient to research. I'm not so sure about the first question, but for the second question, I'm assuming things from my experience. Christianity people in movies, churches, and random people I meet; mostly tend to be black. I don't know if there is actually some study done for this, but why are black people depicted overly verbosed spiritual character in the media?
I have a idea on why this could be and have been thinking about this for a few days randomly, and here it goes. Could it be that there is a inverse proportionality to one's overall well being with god. At least from my experience, people that are worse off( say financially for example) tend to be 'closer' to god'; or at least be more expressive about it. It could be that one looks for a higher way out just to feel comforted and possibly tricked into believing that everything will fall in place if one only places trust on god? From experience all of my friends that are black have rather a hard life financially, and all of them are christians. In contrast, most of my white friends are well off financially, but doesn't seem to be too heavily into god as my black friends. I'm not saying that christians aren't a diverse group, but all I'm saying is that from my experience, it seems like the majority of christians are african americans, and most of them are poor.
Any thoughts?
Why is there more christianity than others?
Actually I have more than one question and they are
Edge cases will show your design flaws in your code!
Visit my site
Visit my FaceBook
Visit my github
Visit my site
Visit my FaceBook
Visit my github
There's no simple answer to your first question. Its a subject that has to be studied and spans 2000 years of history. You need to find the time to do the research yourself, or at the very least google the question and go from there. I'll give you a head start by telling you to read about Constantine the Great, who was a Roman emperor who converted to Christianity and propelled Christianity to going "main stream" throughout the Roman Empire around the year 313AD, where previously Christians were often persecuted.
I'm skeptical that your second question has any merit to it. Just because the majority of Christians you meet happen to be black, does not mean that most Christians are black (I'd suspect that most are Caucasian myself). I think your experience has more to do with the present environment that you live in and engage with.
I'm skeptical that your second question has any merit to it. Just because the majority of Christians you meet happen to be black, does not mean that most Christians are black (I'd suspect that most are Caucasian myself). I think your experience has more to do with the present environment that you live in and engage with.
Hero of Allacrost - A free, open-source 2D RPG in development.
Latest release June, 2015 - GameDev annoucement
I'm not going to talk about the second question.
With the first, however, I can speak a bit about why Christianity spread.
Before christianity monogamy was a lot more rare of a cultural attribute, and wealth was transferred down lines of powerful families who were able to maintain their power by being rather promiscuous enough to mostly ensure they had successors. Once christianity came along, and preached monogamy and other chaste attributes like getting the church's approval to marry and procreate, the church naturally gained a foothold into the wealth and power of royal and elite families as they followed along. Soon it became commonplace for the church to inherit the wealth of a family when it ended since the monogamy resulted in the occasional lack of male heirs. With the faith teaching its servants to have nothing and give the church everything, what would the church spend this on if not further spreading of the faith?
The church isn't the only player by a long shot, since government has in most cases split off into a separate power, and likes to direct public policy to similar practices in most western-like cases.
Whether this was purposeful or not, I don't know, but the feedback loop is pretty evident, I think.
With the first, however, I can speak a bit about why Christianity spread.
Before christianity monogamy was a lot more rare of a cultural attribute, and wealth was transferred down lines of powerful families who were able to maintain their power by being rather promiscuous enough to mostly ensure they had successors. Once christianity came along, and preached monogamy and other chaste attributes like getting the church's approval to marry and procreate, the church naturally gained a foothold into the wealth and power of royal and elite families as they followed along. Soon it became commonplace for the church to inherit the wealth of a family when it ended since the monogamy resulted in the occasional lack of male heirs. With the faith teaching its servants to have nothing and give the church everything, what would the church spend this on if not further spreading of the faith?
The church isn't the only player by a long shot, since government has in most cases split off into a separate power, and likes to direct public policy to similar practices in most western-like cases.
Whether this was purposeful or not, I don't know, but the feedback loop is pretty evident, I think.
http://www.adherents.com/Religions_By_Adherents.html
"Why is christanity the most popular religion in US and possibly the world?"
It was founded by people from a mostly Christian nation. They brought it with them.
Europe, which was/is mostly christian, was a very colonial group of nations. When building colonies, you want the locals to assimilate into your culture, which includes your religion. When spreading their empires, they also spread their religions.
"Why does it seem like the majority of christianity are black?"
"Why is christanity the most popular religion in US and possibly the world?"
It was founded by people from a mostly Christian nation. They brought it with them.
Europe, which was/is mostly christian, was a very colonial group of nations. When building colonies, you want the locals to assimilate into your culture, which includes your religion. When spreading their empires, they also spread their religions.
"Why does it seem like the majority of christianity are black?"
. 22 Racing Series .
"Why does it seem like the majority of christianity are black?"
I thought the same about the second question.
Yea idk, the second question might be stupid, but it bothers me for some reason.
Edge cases will show your design flaws in your code!
Visit my site
Visit my FaceBook
Visit my github
Visit my site
Visit my FaceBook
Visit my github
a lot of Christians in the middle east and Asia now. If you bothered to look up anything, you would see that Islam is on the decline in the Middle East. How is the decline of Islam relevant to this post? Middle East or "Indians" are now being saved. If anything, African Americans are largely converting to Islam in the jails. So your theory has a hole the size of the earth in it right now. If you are basing your assumptions off you area, you simply can not. As with any other thing, research before you post. It wouldn't hurt to know a little bit about a subject. Seems to be common around here for people to assume and jump on the bandwagon when they know little to nothing about such topics. If it isn't on the local news or CNN your lost right? Bandwagon posters ftw around here?
Failure is simply denying the truth and refusing to adapt for success. Failure is synthetic, invented by man to justify his laziness and lack of moral conduct. What truely lies within failure is neither primative or genetic. What failure is at the heart, is man's inability to rise and meet the challenge. Success is natural, only happening when man stops trying to imitate a synthetic or imaginable object. Once man starts acting outside his emotional standpoints, he will stop trying to imitate synthetic or imaginable objects called forth by the replication of his emptiness inside his mind. Man's mind is forever idle and therefore shall call forth through the primitives of such subconscious thoughts and behaviors that Success is unnatural and that failure is natural. Success is simply doing something at man's full natural abilities and power, failure is the inability to act on what man wants, dreams, wishes, invisions, or thinks himself to do. ~ RED (concluded when I was 5 years old looking at the world with wide eyes)
Around 70% of the US defines itself as christian. 13% of the US population is black. So even if 100% of black people are christians, they are still nowhere close to the majority of christians in the US.
I think the reason it's easy to infer that poorer people (not black people) are more often "christian" is that people that are overtly outspoken on certain issues are often overcompensating for something. At least, according to my own experiences. For example, at my home church in CO, I hardly ever heard anyone discuss God and finances. The church had a pretty high giving rate and many of the members were upper-middle class. When I moved to Tulsa, I heard people talk about how they were constantly being blessed and that God was solving all their problems. The majority of those people were in severe financial crisis.
I'm not debating the theology, but from what I have noticed, the more people overly condemn a subject or appear to have complete mastery of an area, the more they struggle with it internally. ie the preacher who is radically outspoken on alcoholism or pornography or adultery, is probably struggling with those things in their own life. The people who brag about how awesome their life is thanks to God, in my experience, are the people who are struggling the most.
So it's easy to think that the people who have the crappiest lives, are uneducated, or poor, are the majority of christians. The truth is, there are milliions of christians that you walk by every day and don't associate with christianity because they aren't outspoken about it.
I think the reason it's easy to infer that poorer people (not black people) are more often "christian" is that people that are overtly outspoken on certain issues are often overcompensating for something. At least, according to my own experiences. For example, at my home church in CO, I hardly ever heard anyone discuss God and finances. The church had a pretty high giving rate and many of the members were upper-middle class. When I moved to Tulsa, I heard people talk about how they were constantly being blessed and that God was solving all their problems. The majority of those people were in severe financial crisis.
I'm not debating the theology, but from what I have noticed, the more people overly condemn a subject or appear to have complete mastery of an area, the more they struggle with it internally. ie the preacher who is radically outspoken on alcoholism or pornography or adultery, is probably struggling with those things in their own life. The people who brag about how awesome their life is thanks to God, in my experience, are the people who are struggling the most.
So it's easy to think that the people who have the crappiest lives, are uneducated, or poor, are the majority of christians. The truth is, there are milliions of christians that you walk by every day and don't associate with christianity because they aren't outspoken about it.
It surprises me that anyone'd actually ask the second question. Not because "it's racist!", but just because it's such a local question.
When I lived in Oregon, I saw very few black people period. I remember non-religious blacks and I remember black Muslims. I remember plenty of white Christians. When I went to Georgia, there were a lot more black people and, generally speaking, a hell of a lot more Christians overall.
This is going to vary state-by-state, town-by-town, neighborhood-by-neighborhood.
If there is indeed a higher prevalence of Christianity among blacks in your state (Connecticut, according to your profile), it may be due to historical accident. Lemme explain...
The so-called Bible Belt consists of states that used to have black majorities. Often around 2/3 black. This is no longer the case; many decided to head north. This migration happened very recently compared to migrations from Europe and Africa many centuries ago... Connecticut has an entrenched culture that's been there for many centuries.
Stats vary from state to state, so if you want to really know, you'll have to hit the books, but I would suggest there may be a higher prevalence among blacks in the north of having families that immigrated from the "bible belt" region in recent history (<100 years). They aren't going to self identify as "southerners" like someone talking about their "irish heritage", and they might not look like Rick Perry, but this is part of their cultural background. The influence of that culture will be there for multiple generations, passed from parent to child.
While there's plenty of northern Christians, the book you have is not the whole story. Cultures vary wildly in how they treat their religion, interpret the truths, the social mores, strategies and tactic of religious expression, treatment of religion in arts, etc. etc. etc.
So you might be seeing that.
Don't miss the word "prevalence" there. There are blacks whose family's history in Connecticut goes back many centuries.
Taking the "historical accident" line of thought a little further, the vast majority of black Christians on the continent had ancestors who were brought there by force and adopted the religion under force. You're seeing this too.
There's no intrinsic reason that Christianity would appeal more to people with darker skin.
There will be a story to it, as there is for everything, but, if so happens that most Christians in your immediate vicinity are black, you would have to do the legwork to get an understanding of the story behind that. And it's going to be a sensitive topic.
When I lived in Oregon, I saw very few black people period. I remember non-religious blacks and I remember black Muslims. I remember plenty of white Christians. When I went to Georgia, there were a lot more black people and, generally speaking, a hell of a lot more Christians overall.
This is going to vary state-by-state, town-by-town, neighborhood-by-neighborhood.
If there is indeed a higher prevalence of Christianity among blacks in your state (Connecticut, according to your profile), it may be due to historical accident. Lemme explain...
The so-called Bible Belt consists of states that used to have black majorities. Often around 2/3 black. This is no longer the case; many decided to head north. This migration happened very recently compared to migrations from Europe and Africa many centuries ago... Connecticut has an entrenched culture that's been there for many centuries.
Stats vary from state to state, so if you want to really know, you'll have to hit the books, but I would suggest there may be a higher prevalence among blacks in the north of having families that immigrated from the "bible belt" region in recent history (<100 years). They aren't going to self identify as "southerners" like someone talking about their "irish heritage", and they might not look like Rick Perry, but this is part of their cultural background. The influence of that culture will be there for multiple generations, passed from parent to child.
While there's plenty of northern Christians, the book you have is not the whole story. Cultures vary wildly in how they treat their religion, interpret the truths, the social mores, strategies and tactic of religious expression, treatment of religion in arts, etc. etc. etc.
So you might be seeing that.
Don't miss the word "prevalence" there. There are blacks whose family's history in Connecticut goes back many centuries.
Taking the "historical accident" line of thought a little further, the vast majority of black Christians on the continent had ancestors who were brought there by force and adopted the religion under force. You're seeing this too.
There's no intrinsic reason that Christianity would appeal more to people with darker skin.
There will be a story to it, as there is for everything, but, if so happens that most Christians in your immediate vicinity are black, you would have to do the legwork to get an understanding of the story behind that. And it's going to be a sensitive topic.
This topic is closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Popular Topics
Advertisement