Hi Andreas,

I remember you once told that you would add support for static public class methods once you had support for namespaces Not that this is an utterly important feature but it still would be cool to have anyway

Regards.

Yes, the namespaces takes me a step closer to implementing static members.

It's on my to-do list, but it's not a high priority item at the moment.

Regards,
Andreas

ok, Andreas, thanks!
can't wait for the next version of Angelscript to be released!

The only reason I decided to bump this thread is that it had just occured to me that static methods would allow nicer registration of singleton/instancing methods. As of now, either a separate singleref factory object or a global function is required but both solutions are rather ugly.