The OOP test....

What?

im sorry, but if a langauge is truly OO, then it has no procedural stuff = no 'functions'.

for instance, to make a language fully oo, then all you would have to do is make functions liek classes, for example.

void MyOOFunc(int x, int y) { static interface: { public: //can be accessed outside of function enum Properties {x = Getx}; void Set(long, ...); private: //top-of-code private stuff int Getx(); int m_x; }; //code } void My2OOFunc() { MyOOFunc::Set(x, 5); }

im actually working on a designing language somewhat like this to write expanding systems.


Edited by - evilcrap on January 1, 2002 11:07:38 PM

honestly, a true oo system really has limited practical applications... its simply has too many features not commonly needed.