Skip to main content
GameDev.net gamedev.net

PRO Tired of ads? Read GameDev.net ad-free and help keep the community independent with GameDev Pro — $3/month.

Embedding Math Equations in Articles
Article

Embedding Math Equations in Articles

In this article I show a few examples on how to embed equations into your articles using either MathML or LaTeX.

Michael Tanczos
Michael Tanczos
August 02, 2013 12.5k views

Introduction

It's no secret that we at Gamedev.net have always been pretty heavy on the programming side of game development. The purpose of this article is to share some quick information on how to beef up your articles with all sorts of fancy pants math equations and formulas that will help others to understand your article topic better.

Background

First we want to give a special thanks to Tim Bright for pointing out MathJax to us. MathJax is a LaTeX and MathML javascript-based display engine that works in all browsers. We currently use the standard configuration of MathJax, so all examples will closely follow the documentation on their site.

Tutorial

Most of this article is based off of the tex samples located at http://www.mathjax.org/demos/tex-samples/ . The key to using formulas inside of your articles is to wrap any LaTeX or MathML formula in one of two special wrappers. For multiline formulas use this: \[ multiline formula goes here \] For inline formulas and equations such as \(\sqrt{3x-1}+(1+x)^2\) you can use the following: \( inline formula goes here \)

Quick Demo

The Lorenz Equations \[\begin{aligned} \dot{x} & = \sigma(y-x) \\ \dot{y} & = \rho x - y - xz \\ \dot{z} & = -\beta z + xy \end{aligned} \] The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality \[ \left( \sum_{k=1}^n a_k b_k \right)^2 \leq \left( \sum_{k=1}^n a_k^2 \right) \left( \sum_{k=1}^n b_k^2 \right) \] A Cross Product Formula \[\mathbf{V}_1 \times \mathbf{V}_2 = \begin{vmatrix} \mathbf{i} & \mathbf{j} & \mathbf{k} \\ \frac{\partial X}{\partial u} & \frac{\partial Y}{\partial u} & 0 \\ \frac{\partial X}{\partial v} & \frac{\partial Y}{\partial v} & 0 \end{vmatrix} \] The probability of getting \(k\) heads when flipping \(n\) coins is \[P(E) = {n \choose k} p^k (1-p)^{ n-k} \] An Identity of Ramanujan \[ \frac{1}{\Bigl(\sqrt{\phi \sqrt{5}}-\phi\Bigr) e^{\frac25 \pi}} = 1+\frac{e^{-2\pi}} {1+\frac{e^{-4\pi}} {1+\frac{e^{-6\pi}} {1+\frac{e^{-8\pi}} {1+\ldots} } } } \] A Rogers-Ramanujan Identity \[ 1 + \frac{q^2}{(1-q)}+\frac{q^6}{(1-q)(1-q^2)}+\cdots = \prod_{j=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{(1-q^{5j+2})(1-q^{5j+3})}, \quad\quad \text{for $|q|<1$}. \] Maxwell's Equations \[ \begin{aligned} \nabla \times \vec{\mathbf{B}} -\, \frac1c\, \frac{\partial\vec{\mathbf{E}}}{\partial t} & = \frac{4\pi}{c}\vec{\mathbf{j}} \\ \nabla \cdot \vec{\mathbf{E}} & = 4 \pi \rho \\ \nabla \times \vec{\mathbf{E}}\, +\, \frac1c\, \frac{\partial\vec{\mathbf{B}}}{\partial t} & = \vec{\mathbf{0}} \\ \nabla \cdot \vec{\mathbf{B}} & = 0 \end{aligned} \]

Demo Source

The Lorenz Equations \[\begin{aligned} \dot{x} & = \sigma(y-x) \\ \dot{y} & = \rho x - y - xz \\ \dot{z} & = -\beta z + xy \end{aligned} \] The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality \[ \left( \sum_{k=1}^n a_k b_k \right)^2 \leq \left( \sum_{k=1}^n a_k^2 \right) \left( \sum_{k=1}^n b_k^2 \right) \] A Cross Product Formula \[\mathbf{V}_1 \times \mathbf{V}_2 = \begin{vmatrix} \mathbf{i} & \mathbf{j} & \mathbf{k} \\ \frac{\partial X}{\partial u} & \frac{\partial Y}{\partial u} & 0 \\ \frac{\partial X}{\partial v} & \frac{\partial Y}{\partial v} & 0 \end{vmatrix} \] The probability of getting \(k\) heads when flipping \(n\) coins is \[P(E) = {n \choose k} p^k (1-p)^{ n-k} \] An Identity of Ramanujan \[ \frac{1}{\Bigl(\sqrt{\phi \sqrt{5}}-\phi\Bigr) e^{\frac25 \pi}} = 1+\frac{e^{-2\pi}} {1+\frac{e^{-4\pi}} {1+\frac{e^{-6\pi}} {1+\frac{e^{-8\pi}} {1+\ldots} } } } \] A Rogers-Ramanujan Identity \[ 1 + \frac{q^2}{(1-q)}+\frac{q^6}{(1-q)(1-q^2)}+\cdots = \prod_{j=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{(1-q^{5j+2})(1-q^{5j+3})}, \quad\quad \text{for $|q|<1$}. \] Maxwell???????s Equations \[ \begin{aligned} \nabla \times \vec{\mathbf{B}} -\, \frac1c\, \frac{\partial\vec{\mathbf{E}}}{\partial t} & = \frac{4\pi}{c}\vec{\mathbf{j}} \\ \nabla \cdot \vec{\mathbf{E}} & = 4 \pi \rho \\ \nabla \times \vec{\mathbf{E}}\, +\, \frac1c\, \frac{\partial\vec{\mathbf{B}}}{\partial t} & = \vec{\mathbf{0}} \\ \nabla \cdot \vec{\mathbf{B}} & = 0 \end{aligned} \]

Conclusion

We hope this helps to build stronger, better, faster mathematics-based articles. Good luck and let us know if you come up with any issues.

Article Update Log

2 Aug 2013: Initial release
License: gdol

Discussion

Discussion

Loading comments...

More from Michael Tanczos