Advertisement

integration

Started by May 20, 2003 07:48 AM
19 comments, last by walkingcarcass 21 years, 9 months ago
Can log_e(x) be integrated wrt x? ******** A Problem Worthy of Attack Proves It''s Worth by Fighting Back
spraff.net: don't laugh, I'm still just starting...
Yes.
Advertisement
i''ve got a feeling the answer is 1/x but i could be completely off....


ho hum......




+ + +


x*ln(x) - x + C
yeah, you do it by integration by parts. set u=ln x, dv=dx, so you get

==uv - (integral) v du

==x ln x - (integral) (x/x)dx <-- since du/dx is 1/x dx and v=x

==x ln x - (integral) 1 dx

==x ln x - x

hence what stdio got...and a good refresher for how i worked it out back in calc 2. hope i did it right anyway

[edited by - draqza on May 20, 2003 10:09:47 AM]
WNDCLASSEX Reality;......Reality.lpfnWndProc=ComputerGames;......RegisterClassEx(&Reality);Unable to register Reality...what's wrong?---------Dan Uptonhttp://0to1.orghttp://www20.brinkster.com/draqza
Cheers.

As a follow up question, my maths text mentions integrals of inverse circular and hyperbolic functions, but offers no solutions. Can they be integrated?

********


A Problem Worthy of Attack
Proves It''s Worth by Fighting Back
spraff.net: don't laugh, I'm still just starting...
Advertisement
Inverse hyperbolic functions, or plain hyperbolic functions?

Plain hyperbolic are easy, A sinh Bx -> A/B cosh Bx, A cosh Bx -> A/B sinh Bx.

Inverse hyperbolic functions are trickier, and use a standard set of results, which from my formula book is:

cosh^-1 (x / a) dx = 1 / root (x^2 - a^2)
sinh^-1 (x / a) dx = 1 / root (x^2 + a^2)

Whose accuracy, of course, is totally dependent on my interpretation of my formula book, which is slightly hard to follow :-)

HTH.



This is the tale of a Northern Soul, looking to find his way back home
There are vast tables of integrals published. Search google.

no wise fish would go anywhere without a porpoise - The Mock Turtle
MDI, that''s differentiating. Sorry to nitpick but integration is a little different.

Ive tried googling, no luck. ''m wondering if they actually can be integrated perfectly at all.

Are there infinite series defined for the inverse circular and hyperbolic functions?

********


A Problem Worthy of Attack
Proves It''s Worth by Fighting Back
spraff.net: don't laugh, I'm still just starting...
AS for ln x you integrate arcsin x and arccos x by parts since you already know how to differentiate arcsin and arccos.
You get for arcsin x:

x arcsin x + root(1 - x^2) + C

I''ll leave arccos x as an exercise for you!

This topic is closed to new replies.

Advertisement