So... (gay-thread?)

More likely a staff member.

poppet dumass

---

[ Cannabis mythology | Nested quotes | HTML Character Entities | M$ ]

This post was made from Mozilla Firebird

Too bad. Why not just lock it, then?

I was about to reply and say how necro-file should be ashamed for what he did to his mate, and how the others should be ahshamed for spouting off "repressed homosexual" with no basis for it.

But it wasn''t me who deleted it. Quite possibly necro-file, I mean, he was getting a bit of a slamming.

Do not meddle in the affairs of moderators, for they are subtle and quick to anger.

---

ANDREW RUSSELL STUDIOS
Cool Links :: [ GD | TG | MS | NeHe | PA | SA | M&S | TA | LiT | H*R ]         Articles :: [ MUD Pies ]
Got Clue? :: [ Start Here | Google | MSDN | GDN Reference | OGL v D3D | Formats | Asking | Go FAQ yourself ]

I deleted it because instead of interesting and thought provoking conversation, all it generated was flames and accusations. I''ve been pissed all goddamn day and I just didn''t need that fucking bullshit, especially from you people.

---

My Livejournal||My Ultimate Game collection||Necro-File''s Lair of Despair

quote:

---

Original post by Necro-File
I deleted it because instead of interesting and thought provoking conversation, all it generated was flames and accusations.

---

You thought posting homophobic comments would generate interesting and thought-provoking conversation?

poppet dumass

---

[ Cannabis mythology | Nested quotes | HTML Character Entities | M$ ]

This post was made from Mozilla Firebird

quote:

---

Original post by Necro-File
I deleted it because instead of interesting and thought provoking conversation, all it generated was flames and accusations.

---

Hmm. So you thought posting a chat transcript about gay proposals would provoke interesting thought provoking conversations eh?

No.. I think that, if you think back real hard, you''ll remember that you deleted it because you looked stupid in it.

Hows this for looking stupid:

FUCK YOU

Yes, you succeeded again. Good job.

OK, let''s make an attempt at some meaningful conversation:

What do you say to the research that has shown homosexuality is evident in the animal kingdom? Do you still think homosexuality is unnatural?

poppet dumass

---

[ Cannabis mythology | Nested quotes | HTML Character Entities | M$ ]

This post was made from Mozilla Firebird

The only research I have heard about that says that is linked to domination, not pleasure. It could also be that the test animals are mimicing something they saw (who knows what does on in those places after hours).

necro-file: I hate you.

I''d say that it''s still obviously "not as nature intended" (seeing how, well, our ''equipment'' is geared towards heterosexual relationships), but that it''s apparently not just a psychological ''fad'' type thing, there is something that plants a desire into any living being (although I''m uncertain about vegetables) to ignore nature''s intent and choose satisfaction via a homosexual relationship. So... Nature is bypassing itself, as it were.

quote:

---

Original post by En Dum En
necro-file: I hate you.

---

the feeling''s mutual, prick.

quote:

---

Original post by The Keymaster
I''d say that it''s still obviously "not as nature intended" (seeing how, well, our ''equipment'' is geared towards heterosexual relationships), but that it''s apparently not just a psychological ''fad'' type thing, there is something that plants a desire into any living being (although I''m uncertain about vegetables) to ignore nature''s intent and choose satisfaction via a homosexual relationship. So... Nature is bypassing itself, as it were.

---

Put it this way: one can only be gay if they have had at least one homosexual expierence, since homosexuality is based on sex, not mental satisfaction. However it is still unnnatural for a heterosexual couple to practice sodomization (anal sex) since that is also unnatural, the anus was meant to expel waste outside the body, not let ''things'' in.

quote:

---

Original post by Necro-File
The only research I have heard about that says that is linked to domination, not pleasure. It could also be that the test animals are mimicing something they saw (who knows what does on in those places after hours).

---

I don''t think gay penguins would be mimicing something they saw. I mean... Who''d do that on the South Pole? outdoors? Would those guys even be able to find their... things?

Necro-File seems to have all the tact and intelligence of a slab of wet liver.

--------------------------------------------
"What you think you see is only as real as your brain tells you it is."

This is the ration thought memorial signature. Please help spread it along, to raise awareness of the steady decrease in rational thought, that may eventually lead to it''s death.

quote:

---

Original post by AnonymousPosterChild
Necro-File seems to have all the tact and intelligence of a slab of wet liver.

---

Am I supposed to take that seriously, from a Canadian?

quote:

---

Original post by Necro-File
Put it this way: one can only be gay if they have had at least one homosexual expierence, since homosexuality is based on sex, not mental satisfaction.

---

I disagree. I know at least two gay couples who are together because they are in love with each other, but choose not to have sex because they find the act unpleasant and filthy.
Besides, I fell in love with chicks before I had had sex. I knew I was a heterosexual without having a heterosexual experience yet.

quote:

---

Original post by Necro-File


Am I supposed to take that seriously, from a Canadian?

---

Hmm... that''s a somewhat nationalist attitude. Wait a minute, nationalist? Hates homosexuality? Sounds like we may have a bonafide nazi.

--------------------------------------------
"What you think you see is only as real as your brain tells you it is."

This is the ration thought memorial signature. Please help spread it along, to raise awareness of the steady decrease in rational thought, that may eventually lead to it''s death.