Skip to main content
gamedev.net
🔒 Locked

Ray Lighting

Started by Myopic Rhino 8 replies 1.6k views
d000hg
d000hg
I can't see any of the pictures, which makes it a little disappointing! I'll check later and hopefully read it then.
Myopic Rhino
Myopic Rhino
That's odd. Is anyone else experiencing this?
rick_appleton
rick_appleton
I'm seeing them.

Off-topic: why do links to articles sometimes take me to the normal GameDev site, and sometimes to the articles with white backgrounds?
khawk
The light background articles you are seeing are the article links in the Articles resource section. When published on GameDev.net's front page, featured articles and columns are given the dark background, multi-page formatting, and are filed in the Articles section with the light background. Due to their shorter length, the links for Sweet Snippets are direct links into the Articles section, since Sweet Snippets do not have the featured article/column formatting with the black background.
Admin for GameDev.net.
johnhattan
johnhattan
They look just fine here.
(my byline from the Gamedev Collection series, which I co-edited) John Hattan has been working steadily in the casual game-space since the TRS-80 days and professionally since 1990. After seeing his small-format games turned down for what turned out to be Tandy's last PC release, he took them independent, eventually releasing them as several discount game-packs through a couple of publishers. The packs are actually
Drew_Benton
Drew_Benton
Quote:
Original post by d000hg
I can't see any of the pictures, which makes it a little disappointing! I'll check later and hopefully read it then.


14.4k user?? [grin]
Thr33d
Thr33d
Sorry to necromance this topic, but I have a concern/question:
in the resultant pictures it appears you're applying the shadowmap, and textures. For accuracy's sake (if you aren't) you should include dot3 lighting (vertex lighting, or "bake" it into the shadowmap). The lit areas will just look white otherwise.

I liked the idea of the (triangular visual) for calculating the shadow contribution. I'm assuming this is to approximate occlusion values (since light will also be coming from the sky, but especially from the direction of the sun). Maybe you could mention that (and maybe suggest precomputing occlusion, etc, if that's within the scope of the article.)


Just a few thoughts!

-Michael g.
Dragon_Strike
Dragon_Strike
yes the idea behind the method is that its a simple way to calculate both directional and ambient light... i forgot to mention ambient light being occuluded sky light... and yes i probably shouldve added some lambertian lighting... but i wanted to keep things simple... been a while since i wrote this... just looked back on it now...

Topic Locked

This topic has been locked by a moderator. New replies are not allowed.

Sign in to reply to this topic.