parameter with no name

Interesting.

What compiler?

Kuphryn

well was there a prototpye of it before that code? Cuz it should work then. Im betting thats what it is. The definition probably just says int x or whatever, since functions are named by > name of the function, param_type, ..etc

There's nothing wrong with not naming the parameter in the parameter list. You just won't have access to it. This is commonly done with arguments in overridden virtual functions which aren't going to be used, because the compiler usually won't issue an "argument not referenced" warning if the argument isn't named.

I've seen alot of function prototypes with nameless parameters, but not methods.

Learn something every day.

Dave

Ok..it makes sense now.