Multitexturing - second texture with offset

If it's a simple offset that you want then the texture transformation matrices should do the trick for you [smile]

Have a read of Texture Coordinate Transformations (Direct3D 9).

hth
Jack

Thanks.

On the beginning I have this situation:
Image1

Then I'm doing something like this:

----
pD3DDevice->SetTextureStageState(1, D3DTSS_TEXTURETRANSFORMFLAGS, D3DTTFF_COUNT2);

D3DXMATRIX mat1;
D3DXMatrixIdentity(&mat1);
mat1(2, 0) = .5f; // x offset
mat1(2, 1) = .0f; // y offset
pD3DDevice->SetTransform(D3DTS_TEXTURE1, &mat1);

pD3DDevice->DrawIndexedPrimitive(D3DPT_TRIANGLELIST, 0, nPrim<<2, 0, nPrim<<1);
----


Now the second texture renders with offset, but this results in not exactly what I want to have. The second texture region that not under the first texture not clamping, but rendering like scrolled:
Image2

I would imagine you'll need to look into IDirect3DDevice9::SetSamplerState() and modify the D3DSAMP_ADDRESSU and D3DSAMP_ADDRESSV settings for the 1st and 2nd samplers.

hth
Jack

Do you know a DirectX8.1 analog for this?
Sorry that I didn't tell about DirectX version in the first post.

Everything works good now. Thanks to all!

What we have: two textures that renders in one pass one above other -
Image1

What we want: to render second texture with offset (half of texture to right for example) and to clamp that region of texture that is not above the first

What we do:

#define D3DFVF_HGEVERTEX (D3DFVF_XYZ | D3DFVF_DIFFUSE | D3DFVF_TEX2)

struct Vertex
{
float x, y, z;
DWORD col;
float tx, ty;
float tx_mask, ty_mask;
};

pD3DDevice->SetTextureStageState(1,D3DTSS_ADDRESSU,D3DTADDRESS_CLAMP);
pD3DDevice->SetTextureStageState(1,D3DTSS_ADDRESSV,D3DTADDRESS_CLAMP);


pD3DDevice->SetTextureStageState(1, D3DTSS_TEXTURETRANSFORMFLAGS, D3DTTFF_COUNT2);
D3DXMATRIX mat1;
D3DXMatrixIdentity(&mat1);
mat1(2, 0) = -.5f; // x offset
mat1(2, 1) = .0f; // y offset
pD3DDevice->SetTransform(D3DTS_TEXTURE1, &mat1);

pD3DDevice->DrawIndexedPrimitive(D3DPT_TRIANGLELIST, 0, nPrim<<2, 0, nPrim<<1);

What we get: everything is as needed -
Image2

If you see any bad moments please write.

Thanks to all once again!