The "Drawings -Figures" section in a patent

Patents are generally written to be as broad as possible, and if you tie it to a single embodiment... that would defeat the purpose.

So how should I describe legally, two different figures that relate to the same embodiment?
It seems to me and I might be wrong that if I use "in accordance with another embodiment" for both, it states that the two figures do not relate to the same embodiment.

I think that I found what I need, something like this:

FIG. 1 is an exploded front perspective view of one embodiment of the present
invention.

FIG. 2 is a partial rear perspective view of the head portion of the embodiment of
FIG. 1, showing the battery compartment and battery.

So how should I describe legally, two different figures that relate to the same embodiment?

Are you trying to self-file a patent? I strongly recommend having a patent lawyer answer these specific questions.

it's a lot of effort and expense to file, and 'wording' isn't the place to try to save $$'s... :)..