Skip to main content
GameDev.net gamedev.net
🔒 Locked

X vs. Y - recommended reading

Started by Aldacron Nov 24, 2003 at 2:45 PM 4 replies 2.6k views
Original Post
Aldacron
Aldacron
Here at the gdnet forums we often see X vs. Y threads (or threads that degenerate into such like the current one about D). There are advocates for various languages, OpenGL and DirectX, Windows and Linux, and everything in between. It never ceases to amaze me how some people can be so eager to bash and flame, or take comments about a language personally, or spread false information... This article was written 3 years ago, but is still very valid today. It was written for the benefit of the perl community, but the subject matter can be applied to anything (it was inspired by an article about baseball managers). The author speaks sense, and I hope many of you read it and think about what he says the next time one of the infamous ''vs.'' threads rears its ugly head.
antareus
antareus
Most language advocates:
a. don''t realize it (because Language X is the One True Way and the rest are too low/high level, too slow and don''t have feature Y)
b. don''t even know their target language completely
c. don''t realize that languages come and go like everything else

The thing is I''ve found the Internet is a huge source of information and an equally big source of misinformation. The fact that anyone can contribute is good and bad. Slashdot is horrible in this regard. I''d love to see a forum/news site that insists on HEAVY moderation, where outright wrong comments are just removed entirely. Then I think people will be less likely to contribute what they "think" is right and more prone to either ask questions or actually search the board and look for answers.

Usually X vs. Y threads have a tendency to suck anyway. Sorry to sound cynical but I''m sure another thread like the D thread will pop up in less than a month''s time, people seem to enjoy shouting that a language that isn''t C++ inherently sucks, and that programming languages have to difficult to learn.
--God has paid us the intolerable compliment of loving us, in the deepest, most tragic, most inexorable sense.- C.S. Lewis
davepermen
davepermen
i for myself somehow love to join the montly raytracing against rastericing thread, as well as the (newly) monthly C++ against D thread..

the more such threads, the more popular.. hey.. months ago, there wasn''t ANY thread about raytracing vs rastericing, nobody even believed that was possible. and nobody knew D.. more and more, both get at least "fightable", so powerful and known enough to get into the thoughts of people.

and thats whats worth fighting for..

vs threads help to open your mind by seeing how stupid closed minds are, and by seeing the closed minds of the "other side".. learn from those threads, its worth it.. i''ve done it so often..




If that''s not the help you''re after then you''re going to have to explain the problem better than what you have. - joanusdmentia

davepermen.net
If that's not the help you're after then you're going to have to explain the problem better than what you have. - joanusdmentia
My Page davepermen.net | My Music on Bandcamp and on Soundcloud
the Speed Bump
the Speed Bump
Nice read.

I hope I don''t come off like that.

"Without deviation, progress itself is impossible." -- Frank Zappa
"There is only one everything"
Raloth
Raloth
People start X vs Y threads because they are unsure of which is better, and they are unsure because any advantage X has over Y or Y has over X is so rediculously small that they might as well be considered even.

[edited by - Raloth on November 24, 2003 5:29:32 PM]
____________________________________________________________AAAAA: American Association Against Adobe AcrobatYou know you hate PDFs...
Aldacron
Aldacron
quote:
Original post by Raloth
People start X vs Y threads because they are unsure of which is better, and they are unsure because any advantage X has over Y or Y has over X is so rediculously small that they might as well be considered even.

[edited by - Raloth on November 24, 2003 5:29:32 PM]


Why people start them is irrelevant. A vs. discussion could be carried out in a rational way. There''s absolutely nothing wrong with evaluating and comparing the good and the bad. Unfortunately, it rarely happens that way. As soon as one person makes a remark about a bad feature of X, someone will take offense and start bashing Y. Then the whole thread degenerates.

That''s what the article discusses.

Topic Locked

This topic has been locked by a moderator. New replies are not allowed.

Sign in to reply to this topic.